L. Noskova
To Win
I. Swiatek
To Win
Naomi Osaka vs Iga Swiatek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W W L L
Form
W W L W W W L W L WHead-2-Head: Osaka 1 - 2 Swiatek
They have played 7 sets in total, with Osaka winning 3 and Swiatek winning 4. The last match between Osaka and Swiatek was at the French Open - Paris, 29-05-2024, Second, Clay with Iga Swiatek getting the victory 7-6(1) 1-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | 1 |
| Iga Swiatek | 2 |
French Open - Paris(29-05-2024)
7
6
1
6
7
5
| Osaka | Stats | Swiatek |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (9-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 77% (23-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 55 | Ranking | 2 |
| 1 | Highest Rank | 1 |
| 27 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 30 |
| 64% (315-178) | Career Total W/L | 82% (372-83) |
| $22,222,319 | Career Prize Money | $28,778,135 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 1-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Iga Swiatek
Player
Naomi Osaka
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
48 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
114
|
||||
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Naomi Osaka
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Iga Swiatek
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 34 | Games Won | 37 |
| 24 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 2:2:22 | Average Match Time | 2:2:22 |
| 60% (147/244) | 1st Serve % | 57% (134/237) |
| 73% (107/147) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (89/134) |
| 39% (38/97) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (53/103) |
| 50% (8/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (9/30) |
| 40% (95/237) | Return Points Win % | 41% (99/244) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naomi Osaka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Naomi Osaka
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Naomi Osaka
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Hailey Baptiste
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
118)
13
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Naomi Osaka
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Naomi Osaka
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Karolina Muchova
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
1-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Caroline Garcia
51%
(
41 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Naomi Osaka
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
14 of
25)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
47%
(
17 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
27
Total Points Won
34
|
4-6 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Iga Swiatek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Alexandra Eala
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
69 of
100)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Iga Swiatek
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Jana Fett
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Iga Swiatek
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Elina Svitolina
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Elise Mertens
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Caroline Garcia
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Iga Swiatek
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(1) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Qinwen Zheng
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Karolina Muchova
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (315/178) | Win/Loss | 82% (372/83) |
| 61% (681/444) | Sets Win/Loss | 77% (773/237) |
| 55% (5673/4729) | Games Win/Loss | 62% (5479/3325) |
| 66% (218/110) | Hard Win/Loss | 79% (183/48) |
| 58% (58/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 88% (139/19) |
| 67% (18/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (32/8) |
| 55% (21/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 69% (18/8) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2114 | Aces Total | 994 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 867 | Total Double Faults | 1143 |
| 1:6:53 | Average Match Time | 1:29:57 |
| 365.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 231.82 |
| 56% (13831/24589) | 1st Serve % | 61% (16763/27319) |
| 71% (9889/13831) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (11419/16763) |
| 49% (5218/10757) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5467/10547) |
| 45% (1248/2763) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1979/3954) |
| 42% (10435/24577) | Return Points Win % | 49% (13678/28149) |
| 73% (66/25) | Slam W/L | 83% (91/19) |
| 62% (81/50) | Masters W/L | 80% (127/31) |
| 75% (6/2) | Cups W/L | 86% (12/2) |
| 59% (79/54) | Main Tour W/L | 79% (79/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (70/39) | Challenger W/L | 83% (34/7) |
| 62% (13/8) | Futures W/L | 91% (29/3) |
| 65% (312/481) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 82% (365/447) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 51% (56/109) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (39/73) |
| 65% (96/147) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (71/105) |
| 91% (292/266) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (352/332) |
| 9% (292/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (352/19) |
| 25% (201/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 39% (103/40) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
